Any Port in a Political Storm

Approval - Any Port in a Political Storm

Good morning. Now, I learned all about Approval - Any Port in a Political Storm. Which may be very helpful in my experience and you. Any Port in a Political Storm

If there is one thing most of us can agree on it is that terrorists are a inpatient lot. They took about eight years to faultless the job at the World Trade town and that was during a duration of passive security. In light of this, man out there--possibly a despondent Katrina survivor, maybe a young Iraqi man who has just lost his house to an errant American missile, perhaps a disillusioned teen clawing a life in some urban slum, maybe a zealot Muslim enraged by the infidels populating western-friendly Dubai--is aligning with Al Qaeda or with some new loosely networked group that is hell bent on delivering a nuclear or biochemical punch to America. After all, delivering such a blow is the extreme statement, the many strike, the instant celebrity any Bin Laden wannabe lives to accomplish. And they have nothing but time and rage on their side.

What I said. It just isn't the conclusion that the true about Approval. You look at this article for home elevators what you wish to know is Approval.

Approval

We also might agree that they are resilient by their numbers. For every hundred who meet dead ends, run out of funding, slip up or miraculously overcome their anger, a few survive to snake along towards the objective. They independently find training camps, fabricate connections, fetch funding, purposely seek out jobs that might position them two years, five years, or ten years out in roles and responsibilities where they are in place to be future agents to a grander plan. In a way they are like a virus that constantly mutates to survive the newest vaccine. If terror influenza can't break out this season, it will transform to break out the next season or the season following.

Now we find ourselves confronted with a dilemma. Once again the Bush inner circle secretly negotiated a company transaction, this time with Dubai, the second largest emirate among the federation of emirates comprising the United Arab Emirates, to own a slight number of piers within a slight number of ports. And when the deal was revealed by that pesky liberal press, as if a beginning gun sounded, Washington's finest made a mad rush to jump into their constituency fox holes, tongues drawn and flailing wildly into the dark social domain. Democrats were dizzy seizing an opportunity to look strong on security. Republicans were franticly separating from the drag the President has become. Talking points ran the gamut from racism to an additional one Bush house pocket lining project. It was crazy; conservatives sounding like liberals and progressives sounding like neo-cons.

Personally, I found some of the positioning amusing, some boring and as usual, all of it based on few facts. Regardless, I was reminded of one golden rule of government: the distance of a politician's vision is directly proportional to the distance of their term. And that plays a huge role in our prolonged infirmity in national security which translates into a great benefit for our enemies. Our leadership and decision makers are constrained by their election campaigns; our enemies are constrained only by their imagination and persistence.

Anyway, given all the political and media noise, I kept coming back to one uncomplicated question: why would we knowingly set up a scenario in which there is an opportunity for exploitation by terrorists?

There are many steps in the importing process of loading, shipping and unloading foreign cargo at our ports. It seems to me this deal with Dubai clearly places the process's final steps at some very strategic ports under the potential control of man who might have bad objectives in mind. It is as uncomplicated as that. With all else we need to worry about in that process, why needlessly add an additional one layer of concern that will genuinely drain already slight resources? Plug the drain by eliminating the opportunity.

And I'm sorry if Dubai doesn't like the second guessing at this late date. Unfortunately, it couldn't be helped. They'll have to get over it, which reminds me of an additional one slight oddity I just have to commentary on. You know, for a President who constantly reminded us during his last election that 'if elected President, Senator Kerry would seek the approval of France for foreign policy', I find it ironic that in President Bush's rush to hold the deal he reasoned that we needed to reconsider how the Middle East would feel if we canceled this deal; that the only explanation for opposition to this deal must be racism.

Well I strongly oppose this deal. It should never have emerged from the clandestine meetings held in the White House backrooms by the administration faithful. It is a short-sighted economic promise that just might behalf a far-sighted terrorist pledge. If that is racist, so be it. But I would argue it is merely common sense.

I hope you get new knowledge about Approval. Where you can offer use in your evryday life. And most of all, your reaction is passed about Approval.